348 research outputs found

    A Birthday Repetition Theorem and Complexity of Approximating Dense CSPs

    Get PDF
    A (k×l)(k \times l)-birthday repetition Gk×l\mathcal{G}^{k \times l} of a two-prover game G\mathcal{G} is a game in which the two provers are sent random sets of questions from G\mathcal{G} of sizes kk and ll respectively. These two sets are sampled independently uniformly among all sets of questions of those particular sizes. We prove the following birthday repetition theorem: when G\mathcal{G} satisfies some mild conditions, val(Gk×l)val(\mathcal{G}^{k \times l}) decreases exponentially in Ω(kl/n)\Omega(kl/n) where nn is the total number of questions. Our result positively resolves an open question posted by Aaronson, Impagliazzo and Moshkovitz (CCC 2014). As an application of our birthday repetition theorem, we obtain new fine-grained hardness of approximation results for dense CSPs. Specifically, we establish a tight trade-off between running time and approximation ratio for dense CSPs by showing conditional lower bounds, integrality gaps and approximation algorithms. In particular, for any sufficiently large ii and for every k2k \geq 2, we show the following results: - We exhibit an O(q1/i)O(q^{1/i})-approximation algorithm for dense Max kk-CSPs with alphabet size qq via Ok(i)O_k(i)-level of Sherali-Adams relaxation. - Through our birthday repetition theorem, we obtain an integrality gap of q1/iq^{1/i} for Ω~k(i)\tilde\Omega_k(i)-level Lasserre relaxation for fully-dense Max kk-CSP. - Assuming that there is a constant ϵ>0\epsilon > 0 such that Max 3SAT cannot be approximated to within (1ϵ)(1-\epsilon) of the optimal in sub-exponential time, our birthday repetition theorem implies that any algorithm that approximates fully-dense Max kk-CSP to within a q1/iq^{1/i} factor takes (nq)Ω~k(i)(nq)^{\tilde \Omega_k(i)} time, almost tightly matching the algorithmic result based on Sherali-Adams relaxation.Comment: 45 page

    Gap Amplification for Small-Set Expansion via Random Walks

    Get PDF
    In this work, we achieve gap amplification for the Small-Set Expansion problem. Specifically, we show that an instance of the Small-Set Expansion Problem with completeness ϵ\epsilon and soundness 12\frac{1}{2} is at least as difficult as Small-Set Expansion with completeness ϵ\epsilon and soundness f(ϵ)f(\epsilon), for any function f(ϵ)f(\epsilon) which grows faster than ϵ\sqrt{\epsilon}. We achieve this amplification via random walks -- our gadget is the graph with adjacency matrix corresponding to a random walk on the original graph. An interesting feature of our reduction is that unlike gap amplification via parallel repetition, the size of the instances (number of vertices) produced by the reduction remains the same

    Many Sparse Cuts via Higher Eigenvalues

    Full text link
    Cheeger's fundamental inequality states that any edge-weighted graph has a vertex subset SS such that its expansion (a.k.a. conductance) is bounded as follows: \phi(S) \defeq \frac{w(S,\bar{S})}{\min \set{w(S), w(\bar{S})}} \leq 2\sqrt{\lambda_2} where ww is the total edge weight of a subset or a cut and λ2\lambda_2 is the second smallest eigenvalue of the normalized Laplacian of the graph. Here we prove the following natural generalization: for any integer k[n]k \in [n], there exist ckck disjoint subsets S1,...,SckS_1, ..., S_{ck}, such that maxiϕ(Si)Cλklogk \max_i \phi(S_i) \leq C \sqrt{\lambda_{k} \log k} where λi\lambda_i is the ithi^{th} smallest eigenvalue of the normalized Laplacian and c0c0 are suitable absolute constants. Our proof is via a polynomial-time algorithm to find such subsets, consisting of a spectral projection and a randomized rounding. As a consequence, we get the same upper bound for the small set expansion problem, namely for any kk, there is a subset SS whose weight is at most a \bigO(1/k) fraction of the total weight and ϕ(S)Cλklogk\phi(S) \le C \sqrt{\lambda_k \log k}. Both results are the best possible up to constant factors. The underlying algorithmic problem, namely finding kk subsets such that the maximum expansion is minimized, besides extending sparse cuts to more than one subset, appears to be a natural clustering problem in its own right

    List Decoding Tensor Products and Interleaved Codes

    Full text link
    We design the first efficient algorithms and prove new combinatorial bounds for list decoding tensor products of codes and interleaved codes. We show that for {\em every} code, the ratio of its list decoding radius to its minimum distance stays unchanged under the tensor product operation (rather than squaring, as one might expect). This gives the first efficient list decoders and new combinatorial bounds for some natural codes including multivariate polynomials where the degree in each variable is bounded. We show that for {\em every} code, its list decoding radius remains unchanged under mm-wise interleaving for an integer mm. This generalizes a recent result of Dinur et al \cite{DGKS}, who proved such a result for interleaved Hadamard codes (equivalently, linear transformations). Using the notion of generalized Hamming weights, we give better list size bounds for {\em both} tensoring and interleaving of binary linear codes. By analyzing the weight distribution of these codes, we reduce the task of bounding the list size to bounding the number of close-by low-rank codewords. For decoding linear transformations, using rank-reduction together with other ideas, we obtain list size bounds that are tight over small fields.Comment: 32 page
    corecore